Question For Obama, Does Israel Stand Results of Negotiations?

Padangekspres.net-Obama knew the answer the question above. Therefore, in a speech Thursday in front of the UN General Assembly rejected demands that the Palestinian request full membership in the UN, Obama is threatening to use a "veto" if the Palestinians go ahead, this American president has made five errors:
1.Kesalahan first, Obama reject and deny the American Constitution itself is composed of three elements: the right of nations (including Palestine) in determining his fate - right here used as the main American base in their war for independence, state priorities and state law -, the right naturally in freedom. Obama's disobedience to the basics of his country for the sake of negotiations.


2.Kesalahan second, Obama lied when he said "no country stood up except through negotiations" and he could find only one example of the Southern Sudan. Whether Obama would then be consistent about the Palestinians as well as he is consistent with the South Sudan?
Is he ready to interact with Israel in a systematic and spirit as he interacts with the Sudanese government that ultimately must be willing to remove the Southern Sudan? Everyone knows Obama will not be consistent for all that. Obama knows that the South Sudan, Sudan and Israel itself is something is something else.
Ask Obama, if the Americans stand up of the negotiations or because of the war for independence from British rule? How is Israel? Is not in the colonized and the imposing stands on Palestinian land and through a vote in the UN?
Israel does not stand up from the results of negotiations, but due to the strength of the great powers, especially Britain and America. Is there any country in Europe, Asia, Africa, the outcome of negotiations? Cheap political games and do not know the political history of the world countries.
3.Kesalahan third, in line with the distorted American politics, Obama tied in the Palestinian right of self-determination with the consent of Israel. In fact, Israel is imported from Europe for control of the Palestinian homeland by force of arms and terrorism, Obama requires approval from Jewish usurpers to the establishment of a Palestinian state that can accommodate the Palestinians who were expelled from the homeland and deprived of their rights.
That is, Obama is not only annul the right to determine his fate, but also annul the right of Palestinians to return to their homeland. Whereas America's elite and all negotiations for the UN to know that this is just the legitimacy of Israel to maintain and support that America for 30 years to perfect his mastery of the Palestinian homeland.
4.Kesalahan fourth, with this attitude, Obama has reneged on international law as the main foundation of the founding countries, independence and sovereignty.
5.Kesalahan fifth, saying Obama "there are no shortcuts to a Palestinian state" is the wrong kind of desperate lies and undermine Palestinian rights, even from the top of the world's highest international podium. Shortcuts are meant Obama is a step in the UN.
Palestinians live under occupation and disposal of more than 60 years. Is this a shortcut? For half a century, Israel has destroyed the cities and villages in Palestine since the "bastard" was established. Is this a shortcut? American funds projects of Israeli settlements on Palestinian land over 35 years.
Is this a shortcut? Israel uses American weapons and purse, to repress the Palestinian political legality and killing them, stealing their land throughout the decade. Talk about what exactly is Obama?
There is a real history of negotiations and "short cuts" that Obama wants to ditempu by Palestinians. try he asked himself since when negotiating the Arab - Israel begins? When the end? By date, it began in November 1973 after the war Ramadan / October in the Egyptian Sinai between Egypt and Israel to hold a shootout after the ceasefire. In 1977, David began negotiations signed by Cam at the White House in 1979.
In 1980 negotiations continued between Israel and Arab states behind the valance. Madrid talks in 1991 suppressed as the inauguration of "negotiation process". Secret negotiations occurred in 1992 Palestine - Israel and the Oslo negotiations ended ditekennya 1993.
Since then, negotiations between the two sides continued terrus. What is now the talks? More than 33 years. Although the route of Palestine is still dark. Egypt recognize Israel and normalize relations do. Jordan followed in 1994, then two Arab initiative of negotiations in 1982 and 2002.
Plus guarantees America and internationally. Israel has never been so giddy reject the idea of ​​a Palestinian state during the year. So it is left to Palestinians only 22 percent of the entire territory of historical Palestine and Israel turned into the greatest military power in the region because of the support fund and American technology. Still, Obama insisted the Palestinian side who refuse negotiations and accused of seeking "short cuts".
Former U.S. president Jimmy Carter, a third party in the Camp David negotiations between Egypt - Israel. From long experience, the former American president concluded that the Israelis as occupiers of Palestinian land is a major barrier to peace in the Middle East intact. This was presented by Carter in his famous book "Palestine, Peace and Non-apartheid" which appeared in 2006.
While Clinton, this week he told the American magazine Foreign Policy that is not intact due to the realization of the results of negotiations are two reasons; the Netanyahu government to avoid the application of the Camp David agreement, demographic changes in Israel so that Israeli public opinion is less interested in peace.
While Obama now managed to convince Netanyahu to halt settlement construction in the middle of negotiations. After that he asked the Palestinians to drape the establishment of their country with the agreement of Israel.
Obama will someday recognize the nature of the game of peace and negotiation as Carter and Clinton. Essentially, they do not have anything for the Palestinians except a promise that will be kept.
After the bitter experience of more than three decades of promises and guarantees that ended with a lie, and demands to the Palestinians to believe in negotiations, the head of the Palestinian authority must ultimately to the UN again. Obama probably remember 1973 when president Sadat of Egypt Anwa said that 99 percent of the problems Arab - Israeli conflict in American hands. But peace can never be whole and true, never could usher in the establishment of a viable Palestinian state to live and thrive.
If that is considered in the negotiations is the result, what then result if the Americans win the case. Nurturing and caring Americans stand with Israel despite the armed force and the UN vote. Now the Americans rejected the establishment of a Palestinian state without weapons and with international legality. (Khalid Dakhil / Columnist Arabia)