South Jakarta Prosecutors office chief Masyhudi says no new evidence
has been presented in the Antasari case review that could prove the
previous trial’s panel of judges were mistaken in their verdict.
“Most
of the evidence was presented in the initial trial, so basically there
was no new evidence that could find the previous sentence was
incorrect,” Masyhudi said Friday as quoted by tempointeraktif.com.
Under
the Indonesian legal system, the case review is the last resort for
Antasari, which means if this fails the defendant can only hope for the
President’s to show leniency to get absolution.
In order to
request the cace review, a defendant must either posses new evidence
that can find that a previous sentence was wrong or have sufficient
arguments and evidences that shows that the previous panel of judges
made serious violations.
Antasari Azhar’s lawyer presented several
experts in ballistics, forensics as well as Andi Syamsuddin, the
brother of Nasruddin Zulkarnain, who was allegedly murder victim of this
case. During the trial, these experts told the court that they had
found several oddities when examining the case.
Forensic scientist
Munim Idris, for example, had told the court that he was once
approached by some police investigators to wipe out the statement that
there was a nine millimeter wound located on the victim’s forehead from
the visum et repertum report.
Former Corruption Eradication
Commission (KPK) chief Antasari Azhar had been sentenced to 18 years in
prison after he was proven guilty of suggesting the murder of PT
Rajawali Putra Banjaran’s director Nasrudin Zulkarnain last year.
Langganan:
Posting Komentar (Atom)
0 komentar:
Posting Komentar